HOW TO PERFORM AN
AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT
G. STUART PETTYGROVE
VITA
1600 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500
Arlington, Virginia 22209 USA
Tel: 703/276-1800 . Fax: 703/243-1865
Internet: pr-info@vita.org
July 1971
Revised October 1981
ISBN 0-86619-039-2
Forward
Local technicians in developing countries increasingly are
being called upon to test innovative measures developed by
agricultural researchers at the national or regional level.
Improved plant varieties, new fertilization practices,
irrigation,
pesticides, new feed mixtures, and improved harvest
procedures are just a few of the more important innovations
that must be thoroughly tested at the local level before
they
are passed on through extension methods to the farmer.
Local research often is not carried out by trained research
personnel, but by extension agents, teachers, training
center
workers, community development agents, foreign technicians,
fertilizer and seed distributors, and farmers with large
holdings.
The purpose of this book is to show local farmers and others
the basic steps to design, execute, and measure an
agricultural
experiment. This book does not cover statistical anlysis; it
is
assumed that trained statisticians are available for this
purpose.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreward
List of Figures
SECTION I. SOME BASIC CONCEPTS
I. The Need for
Local Research
II. An Experiment
Versus A Demonstration
III. Some Basic
Concepts in Statistics
A. The normal
distribution
B. The null
hypothesis
C. The
"significant difference"
SECTION II. HOW TO PERFORM AN AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT
I.
Preliminary Research
II. Designing the
Experiment
A. Replication
B. Random
distribution
C. Selection of
treatments
D. Selecting the
location
E. Plot size and
shape
III. Execution of the Experiment
A. How to lay
out a right angle
B. Labeling and
mapping
C. Uniform
application
IV. Measuring and
Recording the Results
A. When should
measurements be taken?
B. What should
be measured?
C. Put all
observations in numerical terms
D. A report
procedure
Appendix: Table of Random Numbers
Bibliography
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Normal curve
2. Normal curves
with and without fertilizer
3. The completely
random design
4. Random complete
block
5. Random complete
block suitable for demonstration
6. How to make
random the Latin square design
7. Split-plot
design
8. Plot shape
9-A. Laying out a right angle
9-B. Laying out a right angle
9-C. Laying out a right angle
SECTION I
SOME BASIC CONCEPTS
I. THE NEED FOR LOCAL RESEARCH
Many countries today are experiencing what is called
"agricultural
development." Basically, this means three things for
agriculture: (1) it has become more complex technically; (2)
it
has become less oriented to home consumption and more
oriented
to the market; (3) it has become dynamic; that is, it is not
simply moving to a new, more efficient level of operation,
but
is in a continuous state of flux.
In many countries, research facilities have been established
at
the national and regional level. New plant varieties and
innovative
cultural practices are being tested successfully at
these facilities. But before they can have any effect on
farm
production, they must be tested thoroughly at research
stations,
schools, and farms on the local level.
The basic problem facing local experimenters is whether the
use
of a new or different practice will affect the outcome of
some
particular segment of agricultural enterprise in their area.
If
so, to what extent? If farmers fail to adopt a beneficial
practice
because it has not been tested locally, or if they adopt a
harmful practice because it has been tested improperly,
local
extension agents and those who have carried out experiments
must share the blame.
Local personnel have a great responsibility to become
skilled
in testing and evaluating new practices so that they may
avoid
such mistakes. If great care is exercised, untrained
personnel
can become sufficiently expert in experimentation to bring
many
benefits to the local farmers and, hence, to the entire
community.
II. AN EXPERIMENT VERSUS A DEMONSTRATION
What is an experiment?
An experiment is a test or tentative procedure for the
purpose
of discovering something unknown, or for testing a principle
or
supposition. It must be carried out in an unbiased manner.
No
assumptions are made regarding the outcome; the results must
always be accepted. If we suspect that the results are not
typical, we still must accept them, although we should perform
the experiment again. In an experiment, treatments are
replicated,
or repeated, and they are arranged in test plots or as
random units in a procedure.
An observation trial is not used to draw any experimental
conclusions,
but may determine if a practice is worth testing.
A result trial on a farm is the testing or demonstration of
a
single practice that has been proven elsewhere, but which is
still unproven in the farmer's mind.
What is a demonstration?
A demonstration shows a response that already has been
proven
in an experiment. It is not conducted according to the
specifications
for an experiment, and therefore cannot be used to draw
conclusions. If it does not demonstrate the expected
results,
it is ignored, and may then be plowed over to be run again.
III. SOME BASIC CONCEPTS IN STATISTICS
The statistical analysis of results is beyond the scope of
this
paper, but we must understand some basic concepts if we want
to
be able to interpret a statistician's analysis of our
experiment.
The three concepts described briefly here are the normal
distribution, the null hypothesis, and the significant
difference.
A. The Normal Distribution
Assume that there is a large amount of some crop that is
grown
under uniform conditions and harvested in plots of 100
square
feet. The yields recorded for each of these plots probably
will
vary from a very low figure to a very high figure. Most of
the
plots will yield close to a middle figure. As we move away
from
this median to either a higher or lower yield figure, we
will
find successively fewer plots. If the yield is plotted
against
the number of plots giving a particular yield, the familiar
bell-shaped normal curve will result. (see figure 1)
htp1x3.gif (486x486)
If the same crop is grown under identical conditions with
the
addition of a fertilizer treatment, there will still be a
wide
range of yields for the 100-square-feet plots. However, the
entire curve will have shifted somewhat to the right. (see
figure 2)
htp2x3.gif (486x486)
Note that the two curves overlap in the crosshatched area;
some
plots may yield the same with and without fertilizer. If
only
a small number of the fertilized plots were measured, it is
possible that all or most of them would fall in this shaded
area. We would not know from our measurements whether the
fertilizer had really increased the yield.
The purpose of proper experimental design is to allow us to
determine whether the treatments have actually shifted the
normal curve, or whether the effect we observe is simply due
to
chance. This brings us to the next concept.
B. The Null Hypothesis
The statistician begins the analysis by assuming that the
treatments had no effect, and that any effect observed was
due
simply to chance. This assumption is known as the null
hypothesis. If we flip a coin and get "heads" four
times in a
row, we assume this to be due to chance and not because of
some
special quality of the coin.
Next, the statistician processes the data to determine the
validity of the null hypothesis. He or she may reject the
null
hypothesis, deciding that the observed effect of the
treatment
was significant, and probably not due to chance. Or, he or
she
may accept the null hypothesis, concluding that the observed
effect of the treatment was probably due to chance.
C. The "Significant Difference"
The term significant will be found in the results of many
experiments. This may also be indicated by an asterisk (*)
or
by the phrase "significant at the 5% level." These
all indicate
that the statistician has determined that there is only a
five
percent chance that the observed difference was due to
chance.
If the results are found "highly significant,"
indicated by a
double asterisk (**) or by the phrase "significant at
the 1%
level," this indicates that there is only a one percent
probability
that the observed effect of the treatment was due to
chance.
This discussion indicates that a single experiment, no
matter
how carefully designed and executed, cannot conclusively
"prove" that a treatment has a significant effect.
This is why
experiments should be repeated.
SECTION II
HOW TO PERFORM AN AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT
I. PRELIMINARY RESEARCH
Good preliminary research, including a search of the
available
literature and interviews of experienced persons, will save
a
great deal of trouble later. The experimenter should not be
afraid to ask for help now; help may be of no use once the
experiment has been laid out. The preliminary research
should
cover the following points:
(1) A careful study
of the crop should be made. The local soil
should be
studied in fertilizer and irrigation experiments.
For pest control
experiments, information on the
life cycle of
the pest should be obtained.
(2) Economic factors
should be studied, especially if a new
crop is being
introduced. Will treatments affect the
market for this
crop? What is the cost of treatments?
(3) Has this
experiment been performed already? Quite likely,
a similar
experiment has been carried out. Were the
results clear,
and do they affect the planned experiment?
Have similar
experiments been carried out in other
districts?
The preliminary research should be recorded so that it may
be
included in the final report.
II. DESIGNING THE EXPERIMENT
In any experiment, errors are introduced by factors beyond
the
control of the experimenter: soil heterogeneity, plant
variability
(due to genetic variability), plant competition within
and between plots, variation in the moisture content of
harvested
plants, climate variations (when experiments are run for
more than one year) , and the size and shape of plots. Such
errors cannot be eliminated, but they can be reduced,
primarily
by the replication of treatments and use of random
distribution,
careful selection of treatments and location, and the
proper design of plots,
A. Replication
Replication is the repetition of a treatment several times
to
obtain a mean value or yield. In field experiments, a single
replicate generally is planned to contain one plot of each
treatment in a rather compact block. Replication is
accomplished
by repeating blocks. A nonreplicated trial is not an
experiment.
The number of replications depends upon the degree of
precision
desired and the degree of soil heterogeneity. Generally, two
replications is not enough. The American Society of Agronomy
suggests 3-6 replications for field plots. The small number
suffices where average rather than annual results are
desired.
For corn yields, 4-6 replications are often used. For small
nursery plots, 5-10 replications are recommended.
B. Random Distribution
Random distribution means that treatments are assigned to
plots
in a random fashion, or are placed randomly within a block.
The
reason for doing this is to eliminate any bias that might
occur
if we assigned treatments to plots with some kind of order
or
system.
The random distribution procedure should be completely
objective.
It may be accomplished by flipping a coin, drawing cards
from a deck, or by using a specially prepared table of random
numbers, such as the one found in the appendix of this
paper.
1. The completely random design
htp3x9.gif (486x486)
This design results when treatments are assigned to a
previously
determined number of plots. It is useful for some types of
treatments on animals, but is not an efficient design for
field
trials with plants. Its main advantage is its simplicity and
flexibility. Treatments are assigned to plots by drawing
cards
from a deck, slips of paper from a container, or by using
the
table of random numbers in the appendix.
Example: A, B, and C represent three different levels of
nitrogen
tested on wheat. Four samples for each
level X
three levels = 12 plots.
2. The random complete block
In this design, treatments are assigned at random within a
block, and the entire block is replicated (see Figure 4).
The
htp4x10.gif (486x486)
blocks should be kept as compact as possible, and the number
of
treatments as low as possible consistent with the objectives
of
the trial.
The main advantage of the random complete block design is
the
high reliability of the data obtained from it, and its
suitability
for demonstration (as seen in Figure 5).
htp5x10.gif (437x437)
Example: A-F are six different fertilizer treatments for
sugar beets.
Note that each treatment occurs
once in each
block. Six treatments X five
replications
= 30 plots.
3. The Latin square design
In this design, treatments occur once in each column and
once
in each row, and treatments are random in both directions
(see
Figure 6). Thus, the Latin square removes variability in two
htp6x10.gif (540x540)
directions while the random complete block removes it in
only
one direction. The number of replications always equals the
number of treatments in a Latin square design. It is more
precise
than the random complete block, but it becomes cumbersome
for more than eight treatments.
In Figure 6, columns and rows are first numbered from 1 to
5,
and treatments are assigned to the plots in regular
alphabetical
order, simply rotating the order one place in each row or
column.
In the middle square, we have the same square after the
columns
have been rearranged by choosing at random the numbers at
the
heads of the columns.
In Step 3, we have now chosen the rows at random by the same
method. The procedure is completed. Note that in the
righthand
square, treatments appear only once in each row and column.
4. The split-plot design
htp7x12.gif (540x540)
This design is used to test two factors in combination. It
is
not the most precise design for this purpose, but is often
used
to facilitate physical operations. For example, some field
treatments, such as irrigation, are more conveniently
applied
to relatively large strips through the experimental area. If
different dates of harvest are one of the factors being
tested,
it may be easier to harvest in strips through the experimental
area rather than to harvest a few feet of one row and then
skip
across rows for another small harvest area.
There are many split-plot designs. They vary in precision.
If
possible, an experienced person should be contacted for
advice
before one uses this design. The basic design involves
assigning
one factor to main plots that are arranged in random
complete
blocks or in a Latin square. Assign to the main plots
those treatments for which you are willing to sacrifice
precision.
The treatments of the second factor are assigned at
random to sub-plots within each main plot.
Example: Planting dates and fertilizer treatments on
tomatoes.
Three planting dates (main plots) X
four
fertilizer treatments (subplots) X three
replications
= 36 plots.
C. Selection of Treatments
Many factors that influence the farmer's profit can be
applied
as contrasting practices in an experiment. Rate of seeding,
date of planting, spraying and dusting treatments, fall vs.
spring plowing, method of seed bed preparation, surface vs.
furrow application of irrigation water, weed control by
herbicides
vs. cultivation, fertilizer treatments, pasture grass-legume
mixtures, and crop rotations are only a few of the more
important ones.
In selecting fertilizer treatment rates, it is desirable to
use
rates that differ by equal intervals, such as 20, 40, 60,
80,
and 100 pounds of nitrogen per acre. We may have an idea of
what rate would be inadequate and what rate would be well in
excess of optimum. We should test the entire range,
including
two or three levels between the minimum and maximum. An
untreated control plot is not necessary in a fertilizer plot
where it is understood that the crop needs some minimum
level
of fertilizer to grow well. However, the demonstration value
of
any experiment will be enhanced if we designate a control
plot
that represents the local practice.
In a factorial experiment, the effect of more than one
factor
is studied. For example, we may study the effects of four
levels of nitrogen and three levels of phosphorus. This
would
give 3X4 or treatment combinations. You should try to keep
the
experiment simple, not studying too many factors at once.
D. Selecting the Location
This is a highly critical step in the performance of an
experiment.
The most important consideration in selecting a location
is soil heterogeneity. It was formerly believed that
"the
experimental field should contain many different soil types
to
be representative." This is a misconception. The soil
should be
representative of that generally found in the area. However,
the land within the experimental area should be as uniform
as
possible with respect to topography, fertility, the subsoil,
and previous management.
The causes of soil heterogeneity are the following:
(1) Topography: hillsides may cause gullies and the washing
down of
nutrients. Low spots or variation in the texture
of the subsoil
will cause plant variation.
(2) Variation in the moisture content.
(3) Variation in the penetration of irrigation water.
(4) Wide variation in available soil nutrients.
(5) Competition and shading from trees and hedgerows.
(6) Past use of the soil, including previous varietal and
cultural trials,
and previous applications of organic
matter, fertilizer,
and crop refuse.
What steps can we take to reduce the soil heterogeneity?
(1) Select land with a slight (1-2%), uniform slope. Avoid
the
use of draws,
lowlands, and other irregularly shaped
pieces of land.
(2) Where previous trials have been run that might affect
soil
uniformity, grow
one or more "blank trials" before experimenting.
A blank trial is
a single crop--preferably a
small grain--that
is grown as uniformly as possible over
the entire field
to "smooth out" soil variations.
(3) Place new plots at a right angle to previous plots.
(4) Select land at least 20-30 yards from trees, hedgerows,
and roads.
(5) Record all information concerning the past history and
present condition
of the land and included it in the final
report. This will
assist others in interpreting the
results.
E. Plot Size and Shape
1. Plot size
In most local experiment stations or schools where land is
limited, the size and shape of the plot is a matter of
convenience.
However, there are several considerations to take into
account.
There are two basic plot sizes: (a) nursery plots, cared for
by
hand, which often have multiple short rows 10-22 feet long;
and
(b) field plots, adapted to the use of standard farm
machinery.
Larger plots commonly are used for corn, sugar beets, and
hay
rather than for small grains. Small plots may be necessary
where many varieties or strains are being tested, where the
amount of seed of a new variety is limited, or where funds
are
short.
Researchers generally agree that an increase in plot size
will
reduce the error for plots up to about 1/40 acre (100 square
meters). Above that size, the decrease in error is less than
would be provided by an increase in the number of
replications.
Small plots are more variable due to (a) fewer plants,
b)
losses in harvest or errors in measurement, and (c)
competition
and greater border effects.
2. Plot shape
htp8x15.gif (437x437)
Plot shape generally makes no difference. Relatively long,
narrow plots should have their long dimension facing in the
direction of the greatest soil variation so as to overcome
soil
heterogeneity.
There are two other practical considerations in plot shape.
First, plots should be sufficiently wide to allow border
strips
to be removed or to minimize the importance of borders that
remain. Second, field plots should be of a shape and size to
accommodate farm machinery.
3. Suggested plot sizes and shapes for various crops
(from Field Plot
Technique by E. L. Leclerg, et al.
* Small grain: 3-4 rows X 10-20 feet (center rows
harvested).
* Corn: 4-6 rows X 10-12 hills.
* Soybeans: 1-4 rows (2-3 feet apart) X 16 feet.
* Sorghum: 2-4 rows X 30 feet (center rows harvested in 3
and
4 row plots).
* Alfalfa: 7 feet X 60 feet (center five feet harvested with
a mower); 5-8
drilled rows 7" apart with a 12-14" alley
between border
rows; 3-5 drilled rows 12" apart with an 18"
alley, and the
entire plot harvested.
* Sugar beets: four rows (20-24" apart) X 30-60 feet
(plants
thinned to 12"
apart in row)
4. Border rows and guard areas
When there is competition between adjacent rows of different
varieties, especially where they differ in growth habits,
serious error may be introduced. In semi-arid or sub-humid
areas where plants compete for water, small grain yields are
greatly affected by plant competition. For this reason,
single
row plots are not used. With many crops, 3-5 row plots are
grown, but the two outside rows are not harvested for yield.
Where alfalfa rows are spaced 7" apart, interplot
competition
is a serious factor. If alleys between plots are widened to
14", border rows should still be removed because the
alley
itself may allow border rows to grow more vigorously than
the
plants on the inside rows.
Fertilizer application often requires the use of machinery,
but
the flow of such fertilizer may not be precisely controlled
on
the ends of the field. Therefore "guard areas" 1-2
feet wide at
the ends of the plot are thrown out.
III. EXECUTION OF THE EXPERIMENT
A. How to Lay out a Right Angle
If the corners of the plots are not laid out at exactly 90
degrees, plots will cover a different area than we imagine
they
do. The following procedure is based on the fact that a
triangle with sides in a 3:4:5 ratio forms a perfect right
angle.
Equipment
* 50-foot cloth tape measure, heavy string, or wire marked
at
30, 40, and 50
feet.
* Stakes
* String
Procedure
(1) Lay out a baseline with stakes and string. The length of
this line will
equal the desired width of the total plot.
Place two stakes
(A and A') as corner posts, as shown in
Figure 9-A.
Connect A and A' with string.
htp9ax17.gif (437x437)
(2) Place a third stake (B) next to the string exactly 40
feet
from A.
(3) Have a co-worker hold the end of the tape on corner
stake
A while you draw an arc with a 30-foot
radius. You should
swing the
extended tape to draw this arc across the
approximate place
the side boundary will pass.
(4) Have the coworker hold the end of the tape at stake B.
Following the
same procedure as in step (3), draw an arc
with a radius of
50 feet, as shown in Figure 9-B. Place a
htp9bx17.gif (437x437)
stake (C) where
the two arcs cross.
(5) Tie a string from stake A to stake C. This forms a right
angle at A (see
Figure 9-C). Now repeat the process at A'.
htp9cx18.gif (437x437)
B. Labeling and Mapping
Accurate mapping and labeling is a simple procedure that is
crucial for a successful experiment. For example, if someone
pulls up your marker stakes before the experiment is
completed,
and you have made no map for your records, the experiment
may
be ruined.
You must draw a map because field markers often are
obliterated
by weather or tractor drivers. The map should refer to
permanent
structures, such as fence posts, standpipes, building
corners, etc. You should be able to locate each separate
treatment
exactly, even if all the stakes, strings, and labels are
removed from the field. Also at this stage, the planned
treatments
should be listed and described. The map should indicate
which treatment each plot receives.
Field markers should be written in grease pencil, which will
not wash off in the rain or by irrigation water. Stakes may
be
used to label plots; cardboard tags often are used in
orchards.
Make sure your application, the field markers, and the map
all
agree at the time treatments are applied.
C. Uniform Application
Failure to apply treatments uniformly is a very common
mistake
that decreases the value of the experiment. Great care
should
be taken to insure that fertilizer, pesticides, seed
treatments,
etc., are applied uniformly over the plot, as specified.
Application equipment should be cleaned between trials.
Seeds
must be swept out when different varieties are being
planted.
If more than one worker is applying treatments, do not have
the
same worker apply the same treatment over more than one
replication.
Do not inadvertently add factors. For example, when
fertilizer
is side-dressed on a row crop, the shoes on the applicator
may
prune some of the roots, and this will affect plant growth.
The
proper untreated check would consist of a plot through which
the fertilizer rig had been pulled without the material.
Seed
soaked in a chemical should be compared with seed soaked in
water, not with dry seed.
Carefully weigh all the materials used, if so required. Calibrate
application equipment to make sure you are putting on the
amount you think you are. Fertilizer elements should be
mixed
several weeks before the application to allow time for any
chemical reactions to take place.
Obtain a uniform stand. Small grains will tiller--or put
forth
new shoots--where adjacent plants are missing, but corn and
many row crops will not "fill in" empty areas. One
solution is
to plant thick, then thin down to the desired stand.
Uniform care of plots is important. Weeds greatly influence
crop yields and should be removed early in the trial.
IV. MEASURING AND RECORDING THE RESULTS
Considerable time and expense has been spent thus far, yet
many
experimenters fail in the end because they measure and
record
the results improperly. The experimenter may take
measurements
at the wrong time. Or he or she may take measurements at the
right time, but fail to put all results in numerical terms.
He
or she may measure at the right time, and do so in numerical
terms, but fail to measure all the affected attributes. Or
the
experimenter may do all these things correctly, but not
record
the results in a simple, complete form.
A. When Should Measurements be Taken?
Different varieties mature at different times, and therefore
should not all be harvested at the same time. The
experimenter
must watch closely and harvest each variety as it matures.
He
or she must record the total days to maturity for each
variety.
The rate at which results are reached is sometimes
important.
For seed germination, both the rate of emergence and the
percentage
of seeds germinating should be recorded.
B. What Should be Measured?
This is an extremely important question, one not adequately
considered by inexperienced experimenters. In some
experiments,
workers may simply harvest and weigh the crop with no
consideration
for other factors that are important on the market, and
which may have been affected. The market and nutritional
value
of the product must always be kept in mind. Even at a local
experiment station or school where there is no sophisticated
measuring equipment, there are many attributes that can be
measured. For example, fertilizer treatments on tomatoes may
affect not only the total yield, but also the time to
maturity,
the color, the size and shape, and the susceptibility to
diseases. For corn, the number of ears should be counted,
and--if facilities are available--the moisture percentage
measured for a sample of ears that represent all sizes, with
kernels from one or two rows on each ear.
The following are other attributes of field and
horticultural
crops that might be measured:
* Sugar content
of sugar beets
* Specific
gravity of potatoes
* Grade of
peaches
* Oil and protein
content of soybeans
* Coumarin
content of sweetclover
* Hulling
percentage and milling quality of oats
* Ginning and
fiber properties of cotton
* Pithiness of
carrots
In short, when deciding what to measure, always keep in mind
the value of the product on the market.
C. Put All Observations in Numerical Terms
Many attributes of quality do not readily lend themselves to
measurement in numerical terms. For example, we may want to
measure the amount of insect damage on crop leaves after
pesticide
treatments. It may seem easiest to judge damage as
"light," "moderate," and
"heavy." But unless we put everything
in numerical terms, a statistician cannot make use of our
results.
In the case of disease or insect damage, a convenient
numerical
scale should be set up. For example, to measure potato scab,
set a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Zero represents a potato
completely free of scab, and 10 represents a potato entirely
covered with scab. In some places, standard scales have been
established--1-5 or 1-7--and photographs representing each
step
are used as a method of standardization. In general, the
following recommendations may be made.
(1) Try to design the scale so that observations are
normally
distributed, that
is, the middle number is the most frequently
observed.
(2) There should be as many steps in the scale as an
experienced
observer can
distinguish.
(3) Where any individual judgment is involved in making
observations, try
to avoid having more than one person
make the
observations.
D. A Report Procedure
Research is a continuous process, even at the local level.
Single experiments seldom determine new farming practices;
the
results of several experiments have a cumulative effect. For
this reason and others, the written report of our experiment
must receive some attention. It must be complete, but not
overly
complex. It must convey clearly and concisely what the
experimenter tested, under what conditions the test took
place,
and the results. If the report is to be placed in a file
with
similar reports, there may already be a standard format. if
there is no sample format, the following is generally
acceptable:
(1) Title page. This should indicate clearly the nature of
the
experiment. The
experimenter's name, the date, and location
must be included.
(2) Introduction. This must include a review of the
literature
and basic
background information, including all similar
experiments
carried out previously. The problem must be
defined.
(3) Procedure. This must include pertinent soil and climatic
conditions, a
careful description of the treatments, and
an explanation of
how the treatments were applied.
(4) Results. These should be given in both tabular and
graphic
form, with the
results of the statistical analysis shown
clearly.
(5) Conclusion and recommendations. As a minimum, any
further
experiments
called for by the results should be mentioned.
(6) Appendix. This may include a plot map and the
statistician's
calculations.
APPENDIX: TABLE OF RANDOM NUMBERS(1)
htpx23.gif (540x540)
To make random any set of ten items or less, begin at a
random
point on the table and follow either rows, columns, or
diagonals in either direction. Write down the numbers in the
order they appear, disregarding those that are higher than
the
numbers being made random and those which have appeared
before
in the series. If you wish to make random more than ten
numbers, pairs of columns or rows can be combined to form
two
digit numbers and the above process followed.
_____________
(1) Thomas M. Little, and F. J. Hills. Experimental Methods
for
Extension Workers. (Davis, California: University of
California
Agricultural Extension Service, 1966), p. 55.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Hopp, Henry. A Guide to Extensive Testing on Farms.
Washington,
D.C.: USDA
Foreign Agricultural Service, 1951.
Leclerg, E. L. , Leonard, W. H. , and Clark, A. G. Field
Plot
Technique.
Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Co., 1962.
Little, Thomas M., and Hills, F. J. Experimental Methods for
Extension
Workers. Davis, California: University of
California
Agricultural Extension Service, 1966.
ABOUT VITA
Volunteers in Technical Assistance (VITA) is
a
private, nonprofit, international development
organization. Started in 1959 by a
group of
concerned scientists and engineers,
VITA
maintains an extensive documentation
center
and worldwide roster of volunteer
technical experts. VITA makes available to
individuals and groups in developing countries
a
variety of information and technical
resources aimed at fostering self-sufficiency--needs
assessment
and program development
support;
by-mail and on-site consulting
services; information systems training. It
also
publishes a quarterly newsletter and a
variety
of technical manuals and bulletins.
VITA
1600 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500
Arlington, Virginia 22209 USA
Tel: 703/276-1800 * Fax: 703/243-1865
Internet: pr-info[at]vita.org
========================================
========================================
