Back to Home Page of CD3WD Project or Back to list of CD3WD Publications

PREVIOUS PAGETABLE OF CONTENTSNEXT PAGE

Organisation: International Rice Research Institute, Philippines (IRRI)
Author: Ray Lantin
Edited by AGSI/FAO: Danilo Mejia (Technical), Beverly Lewis (Language&Style), Carolin Bothe (HTML transfer)

Annex 2.2

TABLES ON RICE QUALITY

Table 2.2.1. Specification for rice - Fair Average Quality (FAQ).

Constituents of admixtures of impurities

 

Tolerance limit (%)

Rejection limit (%)

Broken

     

Raw: Over 1/4th to 3/4th with opening

 

17.00

25.00

1/8th to 1/4th

 

3.00

5.00

   

20.00

30.00

       

Heated: Over 1/4th to 3/4th

 

12.00

20.00

1/8th to 1/4th

 

3.00

5.00

   

15.00

25.00

       

Foreign matter

     

(a) Inorganic

Raw

0.20

0.50

 

Boiled

0.10

0.50

(b) Organic

Raw

0.50

1.00

Boiled

0.25

1.00

Damaged grains

Raw

2.00

4.00

 

Boiled

2.00

4.00

Chalky grains

Raw

4.00

8.00

 

Boiled

-

-

Discoloured grains

Raw

2.00

4.00

 

Boiled

3.00

5.00

Red grains

Raw

4.00

8.00

 

Boiled

4.00

8.00

Admixture of inferior varieties

Raw

10.00

15.00

 

Boiled

10.00

15.00

De-huskedgGrains

Raw

10.00

20.00

 

Boiled

10.00

20.00

Moisture

Raw

14.00

16.00

 

Boiled

15.00

16.00

Table 2.2.1. Specification for rice - Fair Average Quality (FAQ) (continued).

Commodity

Pesticide

Maximum residue limit

Raw cereals

Azinphosmethyl
Dichlorvous
Fenithrothion
Heptachlor
Hydrogen cyanide
Hydrogen phosphide
Lindane
Malathion
Phosphomoidon
Piperonyl butoxide
Pyrethrins
Thiobendazole
Trichlorfron
Thiophanate-methyl
Thiometon
Camphechor
Chinomethionat
Pirimiphos-methyl
Quozatine
Triforine
Aldrin + dieldrin

Bromophos
Disulfoton

0.20
2.00
10.00
0.02
75.00
0.10
0.50
8.00
0.10
20.00
3.00
0.20
0.10
0.50
0.05
0.10
0.10
10.00
0.10
0.10
0.02 (except rice
in the husk)
10.00
0.20 (except rice
and maize)

 

Chlorpyriphos-methyl
Carbaryl

0.10
5.00

Table 2.2.1. Specification for rice - Fair Average Quality (FAQ) (continued).

Commodity

Pesticide

Maximum residue limit

Rice in the husk

Aldrin-dieldrin
Chlorpyrifos
Diquat
Endosulfan
Fentin
Paraquat
Disulfoton

1.02
1.10
5.00
0.10
0.10
10.00
0.50

Rice, hulled

Diquat
Propoxur
Pirimiphos-methyl
Endrin
Iprodione

0.20
0.10
2.00
0.02
3.00

Rice, polished

Chlordane
Diazinon
Paraquat
Pirimiphos-methyl
Edifenphos

0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
0.02

Note: This list covers only those maximum residue limits (MRLs) recommended by the Codex Alimentarius Commission as of 1983. Limits for other pesticides are under consideration, and those exceeding limits are always under review. The latest information on the situation concerning MRLs for pesticides may be obtained from the Chief, FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Source: FAO

Table 2.2.2. Specifications for paddy - Fair Average Quality.

Constituents of admixtures or impurities

Tolerance limit (%)

Rejection limit (%)

Foreign matter:

   

(a) Inorganic

1.0

2.0

(b) Organic

1.0

4.0

Admixture of lower grades

10.0

25.0

Damaged, weeviled, immature, shrunken, sprouted and discoloured grains

3.0

6.0

Moisture

15.0

18.0

Table 2.2.3. Rice-grain apparent amylose content (AC) type preferred in various Asian countries.

Waxy

Low AC

Intermediate AC


High AC

       

Laos

China (Japonica)

Cambodia

Bangladesh

Thailand

China-Taiwan
(Japonica, Indica)

China (Japonica)

China (Indica)

   

India (Basmati)

India

 

Japan

Indonesia

Pakistan

 

Korea, South

Malaysia

Philippines

 

Nepal

Myanmar

Sri Lanka

 

Thailand (Northeast)

Pakistan (Basmati)

Thailand (North, Central,
South

   

Philippines

 
   

Thailand (Central)

 
   

Vietnam

 

Source: Juliano and Duff 1991; Juliano and Villareal 1993.

Table 2.2.4. Comparison of properties, and energy and utilization in rats, of four yellow milled rice from stackburning of unthreshed panicles plus straw with those of ordinary milled rice.

Property ( at 14% moisture)


Yellow rices


White rices

Crude protein (% N x 6.25)

7.4

8.7

Lysine (g/16 g N)

3.1

3.5

Amino acid score (%)

56

64

Energy content (kl/g)

15.4

15.4

Balance data in growing rats

   

Digestibility energy (% of intake)

96.0

96.6

True digestibility (% of N intake)

92.0

98.4

Biological value (% of absorbed N)

66.4

67.2


Net protein utilization (% of N intake)

61.0

66.1


Protein quality b (%)

52

63

a Based on 5.5% lysine as 100% (WHO 1985)
b Based on amino acid score x TD/100 (FAO 1990)
Source: Eggum et. al 1984; Juliano 1985.

Table 2.2.5. Effects of the environment, processing, and variety on grain quality at different steps in the post-harvest system.

Postharvest
process

Environment


Postharvest
handling

Variety


Remarks

Harvesting

+

+

+

Growth duration; photoperiod; degree of ripeness; dormancy

Threshing

+

+

+

Threshability; shattering

Drying

+

+

+

Crack resistance

Stackburning

+

+

0

Yellowing

Mycotoxins

+

+

+

Hull/husk tightness

Storage/aging

+

+

+

 

Pests

+

+

+

Hull tightness, etc.

Dehulling

0

+

+

Hull tightness/content

Milling

+

+

+

Crack resistance

Marketing

       

Size and shape

+

0

+

Genetically determined

Degree of milling
(whiteness)

+

+

+

Depth of grooves

Head rice

+

+

+

Crack resistance

Translucency

+

+

+

 

Aroma

+

+

+

 

Pecky grains

+

+

+

Stink bug resistance

Foreign matter

+

+

0

 

Shelf life

+

+

0

 

Cooking and eating

       

Amylose content

+

0

+

Vol. Expansion; texture

Gelatinisation
temperature

+

0

+

Cooking time; texture

Gel consistency

+

0

+

Cooked rice hardness

Texture of cooked
rice

+

+

+

 

Grain elongation

+

+

+

 

Nutrition

       

Protein content

+

+

+

 

Vitamin A content

+

+

+

Yellow maize

Oil quality

+

+

+

Unsaturated fatty acids

Seed

+

+

+

Viability, vigour

Source: Juliano and Duff 1991a; Juliano 1993.

Table 2.2.6. Manifestations of quality deterioration in rice at different stages of post-harvest handling chain (from harvest to market).

Postharvest operation

Quality deterioration indicator

Harvesting

Immature grains
Unfilled grains
Chalky kernels
Weed seed and other crop seeds
Insect/fungus-damaged grains

Field drying

Cracked kernels
Water-damaged grains
Germinated grains

Field stacking

Discolored grains
Insect-damaged grains
Moldy grains
Water-damaged grains
Germinated grains

Threshing

Impurities
Cracked kernels

Temporary wet storage

Discolored grains
Insect-damaged grains
Moldy grains
Water-damaged grains
Germinated grains

Drying

Cracked kernels
Impurities

Storage of paddy

Discolored grains
Insect-damaged grains
Moldy grains
Chemical residues

Milling

Broken rice
Impurities
Paddy in milled rice
Red kernels
Low milling degree or whiteness

Storage of milled rice

Yellow kernels
Insect-damaged grains
Moldy grains

Market

Insect-damaged grains
Moldy grains
Aged or malodorous rice
Discolored grains

Source: NAPHIRE, 1997.

Table 2.2.7. Methods of preventing grain deterioration and maintaining rice quality.

Problem

Cause

Solution


Mixed varieties in milling batch


Paddy sourced from different traders or farmers from different areas


Contract growing of rice with the mill giving incentives such as easy-term loans for inputs, assurance of floor gate price based on agreed formula, quality seeds, and technical advice

Contract trading where above responsibilities are passed on to traders of paddy


Red rice and other variety admixtures, contamination with weed seeds


Farmers produce their own seeds or have obtained from unreliable sources; farmer indifference

Contamination of seeds during handling and planting

Germination of residual seeds from previous harvests


Contract growing with seed supply, technical advice and supervision as minimum terms

Price incentives for quality paddy harvest

Extension work among farmers emphasizing rouging and weeding


Chalky, immature and unfilled grains

Pre-mature harvest

Insect, rodent and fungus infestations of rice plants; plant malnutrition; varietal characteristics

Prolonged wet weather during rice maturing period causing crop lodging and water-damage to grains

Information on maturity duration of variety and maturity indicators such as clear and firm hulled grain from upper portion of panicle and hard dough stage of grain from base of panicle

Apply pest control measures (see section 5); choose good varieties

Mechanical harvesting

Grain quality deterioration in the field


Improper field drying

Prolonged stacking


Minimize field drying or confine to dry season; Spread out small bundles in field

Thresh as soon as possible; aerate stacked paddy or make only small stacks

Table 2.2.7. Methods of preventing grain deterioration and maintaining rice quality (continued).

Problem

Cause

Solution


Mechanical damage in threshing


Animal or vehicle trampling, impact threshing and too high speed of threshing drum of mechanical-powered threshers.

Use axial flow thresher or foot threshing method in case of low-volume harvest or for seed grain; avoid beating and animal trampling.

Grain quality deterioration in drying


Delayed and improper sundrying or mechanical. drying


Immediately dry wet grain after harvest, preferably within 24 hours or at least aerate the grain pile to avoid heat accumulation.

Avoid overdrying and rewetting of grain as often the case in sundrying system.

Avoid fast drying of grain from 18% to 14% moisture content by using low temperature (maximum, 40oC).

Practice sanitation during drying to avoid contamination of grains; protect from insects, rodents and birds.

Ensure uniform drying by avoiding creation of hot and wet spots and mechanical damage due to handling.

Grain quality deterioration in milling

Fissured grains; improper drying and post drying handling.

Immature and chalky grains.

Poor technology.

Improper adjustment of machine


Pay attention to good production, harvesting, and drying practices.

Select rice mills recommended for the predominant variety or type (short, medium and long grain; indica or japonica; high or low amylose content).

Technician training in rice milling operation and maintenance.

Practice sanitation during milling and after milling season; general cleaning of mill parts and mill site to prevent harbouring of insects, rodents, birds and fungi (see section 5)

Table 2.2.7. Methods of preventing grain deterioration and maintaining rice quality (continued).

Problem

Cause

Solution

Grain quality deterioration during storage of paddy


Grain moisture content above that of equilibrium with atmospheric conditions - normally 14% in tropical regions.

Damaged grains.

Improper storage structure; inadequate aeration.

Unevenly dried grain.

Simultaneous exposure of storage container to different temperatures (e.g. one side of silo or bin exposed to sun).


Practice proper drying; accurately determine and monitor grain moisture content; periodically inspect and sample for infestations - drop sample sack or bag several times to determine infestations of beetles; practice sanitation in storage area and premises.

Proper handling during drying and transport.

Rodent- and insect-proof storage structures; fumigate as and when recommended (see section 5).

Provide aeration to stored grain and stir grain bulk occasionally; keep storage cool and dry.

Turnover stocks fast; do not store too long; practice stock first-in first-out in warehouse management; move stocks in sacks about to discourage pest residence and multiplication.

Grain quality deterioration during storage of milled rice


Prolonged storage.

Damaged grains.

Improper storage structure or container.

Wet and high temperature spots inside bulk rice due to insect activity and poor aeration.

Contaminated rice.


Fast turn-over of rice stocks.

Reduce damage to grains; grade and clean the rice to remove brokens and powdery matter.

Aeration.

Sanitation; avoid contamination.

Protection from pests.

Fumigate as and when recommended.

Source: NAPHIRE 1997

PREVIOUS PAGETABLE OF CONTENTSNEXT PAGE


INPhO e-mail: inpho@fao.org
INPhO homepage: https://www.fao.org/inpho/